Logic and Parables: Do These Narratives Provide Arguments?

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Logic of Probabilistic Arguments

1 CHARLES RIVER ANALYTICS, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Abstract We present a logic for reasoning with probabilistic arguments to help decision making under uncertainty. The syntax of the logic is essentially modal propositional, and arguments of decision makers are expressed as sentences of the logic, with associated supports drawn from a probability dictionary. To aggregate a set of arguments for...

متن کامل

Generalized Semantic Schemas and Arguments to Use These Structures

The concept of semantic schema (or θ-schema) is an abstract structure and can be used to represent knowledge. As defined in [9], this structure uses one operator symbol denoted by θ. In this paper we present the following concepts and results: we introduce the concept of Θ-schema (or generalized semantic schema), where Θ = {θ1, . . . , θn} is a finite set of operator symbols, by extending the c...

متن کامل

Eschatology and the Parables

In any attempt to understand the teaching of Jesus as recorded in the Synoptic Gospels, a consideration of the parables must take an important place. This is demonstrated not merely by the plethora of critical study and popular exposition to which the parables have given rise, but above all by the place which the parables occupy in the Synoptic tradition. According to A. M. Hunter roughly one t...

متن کامل

Diagonal arguments and fixed points

‎A universal schema for diagonalization was popularized by N.S‎. ‎Yanofsky (2003)‎, ‎based on a pioneering work of F.W‎. ‎Lawvere (1969)‎, ‎in which the existence of a (diagonolized-out and contradictory) object implies the existence of a fixed-point for a certain function‎. ‎It was shown that many self-referential paradoxes and diagonally proved theorems can fit in that schema‎. ‎Here‎, ‎we fi...

متن کامل

Modelling Imprecise Arguments in Description Logic

Real arguments are a mixture of fuzzy linguistic variables and ontological knowledge. This paper focuses on modelling imprecise arguments in order to obtain a better interleaving of human and software agents argumentation, which might be proved useful for extending the number of real life argumentative-based applications. We propose Fuzzy Description Logic as the adequate technical instrumentat...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Informal Logic

سال: 2012

ISSN: 0824-2577,0824-2577

DOI: 10.22329/il.v32i2.3457